![]() The full NYT article goes into greater details and provides additional supporting evidence, but the basic rundown of the allegations follows: Not only does the article allege the 2018 Triple Crown winner ran all three races after a failed drug test, but that the CHRB went out of its way to allow Justify and his team to continue racing contrary to sport rules. The New York Times article makes multiple serious allegations that have already mired Justify, his training team and the California Horse Racing Board (CHRB) in controversy. We offer no judgment on the veracity of the Justify drug testing story – today we simply look at what has been alleged and how each side has responded so far. With a potential Justify scandal brewing, we look today at both sides of the story as told by key characters. ![]() Craig Robertson III described the New York Times article as “long on sensationalism, short on facts.” In a response issued this morning, Baffert attorney W. The story has all the potential to become one of horse racing’s great scandals, but now Justify trainer Bob Baffert and his attorney are pushing back against the story. ![]() A New York Times story published yesterday alleges 2018 Triple Crown winner Justify failed a drug test prior to his historic run and was allowed to race anyways. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |